<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Fior Research blog</title>
    <link>https://fiorresearch.com/blogs/</link>
    <atom:link href="https://fiorresearch.com/blogs/rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <description>Practical notes on judging and improving the quality of research, drawn from independent review work with humanitarian and development organisations.</description>
    <language>en-gb</language>
    <item>
      <title>The peer review gap: why so much humanitarian evidence goes unchecked</title>
      <link>https://fiorresearch.com/blogs/peer-review-gap-humanitarian-evidence/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://fiorresearch.com/blogs/peer-review-gap-humanitarian-evidence/</guid>
      <description>Much humanitarian and development research is never independently checked before it shapes decisions. Why that gap matters, and what review can offer.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
